Press enter to see results or esc to cancel.

300tube Big Think   19 June, 2017
 14,421

What Climate Science Can (and Can’t) Predict | Philip Kitcher

People tend to bandy around the term "scientific consensus" a lot, particularly when talking about climate change. When 97% of the scientific community agrees that climate change is a real thing, you have to wonder about the remaining 3%. Are they being true skeptics, or are they holding out for ulterior motives? Philip Kitcher has a theory that blows the "skeptics" idea out of the water; the scientific consensus that human beings have been making the world hotter has been agreed upon for close to 100 years, and climate scientists who disagree are disagreeing with the fundamentals of science itself. Kitcher goes on to predict what havoc future generations might have to face if we don't look hard in the mirror about climate change. We shouldn't wait until lizards start living at the north and soul poles to change our human behaviors—we should be the change today.

Read more at BigThink.com: http://bigthink.com/videos/philip-kitcher-climate-science-is-there-any-room-for-skepticism

Follow Big Think here:
YouTube: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigthink

Transcript: So the sciences are always revisable. It’s quite astonishing when we look back into the past how different the views, the quite well-defended views and quite successful views of people in the past were from the views that we have today. 

So science does change a lot. Now some people see in that grounds for doubt, but I like many other philosophers would want to say that no, what we see here is a considerable progression. It’s the ideas of the older generation get developed, extended, unrefined in our newer views. And so it seems to me that once the essence of science is that it’s never final. Although it’s perfectly reasonable for the scientists at any given time to treat what they’ve got very strong evidence for as if it were the final truth because they know from reflecting on the historical development of the sciences that’s a very good way of getting to the views that will eventually superseded the views that they now have. So you can think about it if you like as a process in which taking very seriously the ideas that you now have after they’ve been subjected to all sorts of rigorous testing and rigorous reflection and then trying to build on those leads you to better and better views that give you more and more predictive power, control over the natural world and more success in the ways in which you want to intervene in various aspects of the world. 

A lot of people are worried about various claims that get made. I mean in the case of climate science what seems to me to be the case is that people quite naturally hear the climate science consensus as a very powerful warning, something that might incline them to change their views and change the ways in which they live. And they want to know perfectly reasonably whether the evidence is sufficiently strong so that they should perhaps sacrifice things that they’re used to enjoying and used to doing. So I think there’s a reasonable form of skepticism here. But any analogy with a sort of 'yesterday it was this, today it’s that, tomorrow it’s going to be something else' approach to this seems to be completely unfounded. Climate science is built on views about the atmosphere that have been developed very successfully and in a very rigorous way from the nineteenth century to the present. There isn’t any doubt about the mechanisms of the greenhouse effect. There isn’t really any doubt about the evidence behind the consensus that says that we have contributed enormously to the warming effects that are now becoming apparent not only in the present but also from the record of the earth’s average temperature. So all of that is as well founded as other things that people take for granted that science tells them like that water is H2O. Like the law of falling bodies. Like the fact that the earth is round and so on and so forth. There’s no more reason to be skeptical about the basic consensus of climate science than there is about any of those other things.

Posts The Neuroscience of Creativity, Perception, and Confirmation Bias | Beau Lotto
Posts Tucker Exposes: Bill Nye Is A Fraud. Fake "Science" Can't Cuck The Tuck!!
Posts Freeman Dyson: Climate Change Predictions Are "Absurd"
Posts 9 Awesome Science Tricks Using Static Electricity!
Posts 10 Amazing Science Experiments! Compilation
Posts Why Don’t Humans Live for More than 100 Years? | Physicist Geoffrey West
Posts How Our Cognitive Biases Create Emotional Conflict, and How to Rise above It | Dan Shapiro
Posts Is Race Genetic or Socially Constructed? | Philip Kitcher
Posts Genius Is Not about Excelling at Something—It's about Doing Things Differently | Eric Weinstein
Posts 6 Amazing Science Experiments
Posts The Science of Optimism: How Gender, Age, and Race Affect Your Outlook | William Magee
Posts Brain Training to Beat Procrastination with the World's Easiest Learning Technique | Barbara Oakley
Posts 3 Brain Systems That Control Your Behavior: Reptilian, Limbic, Neo Cortex | Robert Sapolsky
Posts Goal Setting Is a Hamster Wheel. Learn to Set Systems Instead. | Adam Alter
Posts 3 Warnings to Stop Global Catastrophe: CRISPR, AI, & Robots | Richard Clarke
Posts Nofap Re:wire | It’s time to BREAKTHROUGH
Posts CRISPR's Gene Drive Could Revive Extinct Species–or Create New Ones | Jennifer Doudna
Posts Neil deGrasse Tyson: Dark Matter, Dark Gravity, Ghost Particles, & the Essence of All Objects
Posts 9 Incredible Science Facts You Probably Didn't Learn At School
Posts Clear Evidence of CLIMATE CHANGE! Arctic And Antarctic Ice Are Melting Very Fast Now!
Posts Sam Harris: The Self is an Illusion
Posts Capitalism 2.0 Will Include a Healthy Dose of Socialism | Eric Weinstein
Posts Scientists really aren’t the best champions of climate science
Posts Henry Rollins: The One Decision that Changed My Life Forever
Posts The Science of Learning: How to Turn Information into Intelligence
Posts Illinois financial COLLAPSE draws near
Posts CRISPR 101: Curing Sickle Cell, Growing Organs, Mosquito Makeovers | Jennifer Doudna
Posts Neil deGrasse Tyson: Atheist or Agnostic?
Posts Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children
Posts Time Paradox: Why Pleasure Is Fleeting and Pain Endures | Dean Buonomano
Posts Sam Harris: Mindfulness is Powerful, But Keep Religion Out of It
Posts Einstein’s Persistence, Not Genius, Is the Reason We Know His Name | David Bodanis
Posts Why Buy Things You Only Use Once? Enter the Subscription Economy | Kevin Kelly
Posts Cornel West: The Difference Between Justice and Revenge
Posts Faith and Hope Are Two Different Philosophical Mindsets | Sam Newlands
Posts Consciousness Is a Narrative Created by Your Unconscious Mind | Dean Buonomano
Posts How Some People Predict Disasters before They Happen: ISIS, Katrina, Fukushima | Richard Clarke
Posts Alarming Rise in Methane Gas Has a Bigger Impact on Climate Change Than We Ever Thought
Posts How to Think Like a Philosopher, with Daniel Dennett | Big Think Mentor
Posts The Constitution and the Cross (with Monica Miller)
Posts Science Must Fall | South Africa
Posts Religion Can Be Dangerous without a Sense of Humor | Dave Barry
Posts The Truth about Job-Taking Machines, Globalization, and Mexican Trade | Robert Kaplan
Posts The 97% 'Consensus' on Climate Science
Posts Summer Heat Fraud From Climate Central
Posts Top 10 Science Experiments - Experiments You Can Do at Home Compilation
Posts Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
Posts Hey Bill Nye, Do You Believe In Free Will?
Posts LGBTQ Revolution: Coming Out, Harvey Milk, Live-Saving Statistics | Bennett Singer
Posts 10 Natural Phenomena Science Can't Explain